AG v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] — Tort Law Cases — Leveluplaw
Skip to Content
Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169
Uncover the case of Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 and learn about the distinction between public and private nuisance in this intriguing blog post.
Attorney-General v PYA Quarries – Case Summary
They were accused of causing a public nuisance because of the widespread dust, vibration and projectiles coming from the quarry. As a result of a relator action brought by the Attorney …
PUBLIC NUISANCE: PUBLIC WRONGS AND CIVIL RIGHTS …
9 A-G v PYA Quarries Ltd, [1957] 2 QB 169. 10 Keith Stanton & Christine Willmore, "Tort and Environmental Pluralism" in John Lowry & Rod Edmunds, eds, Environmental Protection and the Common Law (Oxford: Hart, 2000) ch 5 at 100. 11 Stein v Gonzales (1984), 14 DLR (4th) 263 (BCSC, McLachlin J). 12 Ibid; Ewen, supra note 5; Canfor note 1 at ...
Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169
Uncover the case of Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 and learn about the distinction between public and private nuisance in this intriguing blog post. AREA: NuisanceFACTS:The defendants ran a quarry and employed a blasting method that produced a lot of dust, noise, and vibrations that made it difficult for many people in the ...
Public Nuisance
Public Nuisance Lecture Notes - Definition – The classic definition may be found in Romer L.'s judgment in Att- Gen v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169: "any nuisance is 'public' which materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of Her Majesty's subjects. The sphere of the nuisance may be described generally as 'the neighbourhood'; but …
Capacity
A. G. v. PYA Quarries 1957 House of Lords. A quarries mine produced noise and dirt. The people in a small village wanted to sue for public nuisance. First they were told to go to a civil court, but then they could go for public nuisance. They succeeded. A small village's population is enough to be Her Majesty's subject.
Law of Tort
Therefore, must be a member of the affected 'class' see AG v PYA Quarries Ltd. Local authority can bring an action on behalf of the public under section 222 of the Local Government Act 1972. No requirement that the claimant should have an interest in the land (Colour Quest Ltd and Others v Total Downstream UK PLC and Others [2009] EWHC 540).
Attorney-General v PYA Quarries Ltd: CA 1957
In a relator action, an injunction was sought to prevent the respondent from emitting quantities of dust from their quarry. The court had to decide what were the constituents of the offence of a public nuisance, and how this differed from a private nuisance. Held: Romer LJ said: 'I do not propose to attempt a … Continue reading Attorney-General v PYA Quarries Ltd: CA …
Private law and the environment: nuisance in context
However, the action in RyZunds v Fletcher must now, for the reasons explained below, be seen as closely related to nuisance, at least in English law; and there is some overlap between public and private nuisance, in that a public nuisance can be constituted by an accumulation of private nuisances: A-G v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169.
A2 Case Law
AG v PYA Quarries Ltd. Defined Public Nuisance. Castle v St Augustine Links. Special damages, taxi driver hit in eye by golf ball. R v Ruffell. Acid house party, class affected were the locals. R v Ong. Football floodlights failed, class affected were the football fans. R v Lowrie.
Tort: Nuisance cases Flashcards
Study with Quizlet and memorise flashcards containing terms like AG v PYA Quarries Ltd, Corby Group Litigation v Corby Borough Council, Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd and others.
Public Nuisance Flashcards
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Definition, AG v PYA Quarries LTD, Class of people and more.
Attorney General v PYA Quarries
The defendants operated a quarry and used a blasting technique which emitted large quantities of dust and noise, as well as causing vibrations which interfered with the enjoyment of land for many individuals in the area. The claimants sought an injunction preventing the continuation …
Private Nuisance Chart
A. Public Nuisance: 1. Was nuisance 'public' in nature? v AG v PYA Quarries (1957): where nuisance from quarry affected nearby houses and highway user. Held: " widespread in range and indiscriminate in nature " = public nuisance (Lord Denning). " Interference that materially affects the reasonable comfort & convenience of a ... cross section of society " = public nuisance ...
House of Lords
Romer LJ made this point in Attorney General v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169, where the court granted an injunction against the defendants carrying on their business in such a manner as to cause splinters to be projected from the confines of their quarry or to occasion a nuisance to Her Majesty's subjects by dust or vibration. In the ...
Public Nuisance Flashcards
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like AG v PYA Quarries Roman, (1) Affect a cross section of the class (2) Involve Special Damage, AG PYA Quarries and more. ... Colour Quest Ltd. No requirement for C to have a proprietary interest in the land. Corby Group Litigation Claimants v Corby BC.
Public Nuisance Flashcards
Study with Quizlet and memorise flashcards containing terms like What is the definition of Public Nuisance and its case., What are the steps for Public, What is step 1 of Public, and its case and others.
AG v PYA Quarries Ltd one paragraph summary public …
In the case of A-G v PYA Quarries Ltd (1957), the court defined a public nuisance as an act or omission that materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of …
Tort: Nuisance
If it is 'so widespread in its range or so indiscriminate in its effect that it would not be reasonable to expect one person to take proceedings on his own responsibility to stop it': Attorney-General v PYA Quarries Ltd [1957] 2 QB 169. There is no need to show every member of the class has been affected, just a representative cross-section.
Nuisance Part 2
Key Case: AG v PYA Quarries (1957) Key Facts: The noise, vibrations and dust coming from the quarry created a nuisance for the people living nearby. ... Halsey v Esso Petroleum co ltd (1961) Key Facts: An oil depot opposite the claimant emitted acid smuts which damaged his car, and loud noises at night from the tankers. Held: the plaintiff is ...
Torts Of Land 2 Public Nuisance Rylands
NO exact number, depends on facts of case (AG v Hastings; R v Rimmington (2005), HL). AG v PYA Quarries (1957): wont' give a definite number, depends on facts of case. R v Madden (1975): Court held: not enough people affected to make a class, only 8. CF Jan de Nul v NV Royale Belge. Obstruction on an estuary; very few ppl used the estuary.
Tort Public Nuisance Notes
Tort / Public Nuisance Notes. Definition: Attorney General v PYA Quarries - "Acts or omissions of the defendant that materially affect the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of her majesty's subjects." Who can sue: individual (IF they have suffered special damage, but no need for interest in land); local authority or AG (on behalf of group
ag vs pya quarries ltd
Romer LJ in AG v PYA Quarries Ltd (1957) 'something which materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of a class of his majestys subjects' Public nuisance is a tort and crime triable either way. mcmaster carr supplier in malaysia. n n A Noob's Guide to McMaster Carr Hackaday n. Sep 13,2017· A Noob's Guide to McMaster Carr,this in ...
ag مقابل pya quarries ltd
ag مقابل pya quarries ltd Attorney General v PYA Quarries Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 Nuisance – Public Nuisance – Indiscriminate Effect Facts The defendants operated a quarry and used a blasting technique which emitted large quantities of dust and noise, as well as causing vibrations which interfered with the ...
Attorney General v PYA Quarries Ltd
Her Majesty's Attorney-General on the Relation of the Glamorgan County Council and the Pontardaws Rural District Council. P.Y.A. Quarries Limited. Lord Justice Parker.
TABLE OF CASES
Cement LaFarge Ltd v. BC Lightweight Aggregate Ltd [1983] 1 SCR 452, 148 Century Insurance Company Ltd v. Northern Ireland Road Transport Board [1942] AC 509, 203 Chance, ex parte Smith, R v. [1995] CLY 147, 376 Chappell (1985) 80 Cr App R 31, 315, 316 Chargot Ltd [2009] 1 WLR 1, 83 4 Charing Cross, West-End and City Electricity Supply Company ...
Public Nuisance Flashcards
Romer LJ in AG v PYA Quarries Ltd (1957) ... AG v PYA Quarries: Lord Denning "taken on the responsibility of the community at large." Romer LJ: "sufficient number of people affected" varies in each case R v Johnson- Was a class R v Rimmington- Wasnt a class. Step 4: Special Damage.
AG v PYA Quarries Ltd one paragraph summary public …
A-G v PYA Quarries Ltd Case Summary. In the case of A-G v PYA Quarries Ltd (1957), the court defined a public nuisance as an act or omission that materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of Her Majesty's subjects. The case involved PYA Quarries Ltd, a company that operated a quarry and caused significant dust and vibration affecting local …
Law of Tort Lecture 6
Slide 6 – Attorney General v PYA Quarries Ltd 1957. Defendant was emitting quantities of stones, splinters dust and vibration from their quarry which was disturbing the local residents. Slide 7&8&9 – A 'class' of people. The facts of the case determine if the persons affected by a nuisance amount to a class of people.